Playwright makes it easy to run end-to-end tests, but once those tests run continuously in CI, understanding the results becomes harder than it should be.
Teams often struggle to answer basic questions:
Playwright provides test output through reporters, logs, and artifacts produced during CI runs. These are useful for debugging individual failures, especially when a test fails unexpectedly.
However, this information is scoped to a single run. Once the next CI job starts, previous results are difficult to compare or analyze without manual effort.
As Playwright test suites grow in size and run frequency, teams often run into limitations:
At this point, test results stop being a simple pass/fail signal and start becoming data that needs to be tracked and understood.
Teams that successfully manage Playwright tests in CI usually have:
This allows engineers to focus on fixing problems instead of chasing logs.
Common approaches include:
Each approach has tradeoffs between setup effort, flexibility, and long-term maintainability.
Tesults provides a way to collect Playwright test results from CI and view them in a centralized dashboard with history and trends.
If you want to see how to upload Playwright test results the setup steps are documented here:
Playwright test results upload
If you want to see how to upload Playwright test results from CI, including GitHub Actions, the setup steps are documented here:
Playwright test results with GitHub Actions
If you want to try this with your own Playwright suite, create a Tesults account and follow the setup links above.